A 3-year-old unvaccinated child presents with high fever, severe sore throat, drooling, and respiratory distress. The culture shows smooth translucent colonies on chocolate agar, no growth on blood agar, growth around Staphylococcus aureus on blood agar, slight oxidase activity, bubbling catalase, and red fluorescence for ALA-porphyrins is absent. Which organism is most likely?

Prepare for the CAMLPR Microbiology Test. Utilize flashcards and engaging multiple-choice questions, each equipped with descriptions and explanations. Ready yourself for an excellent performance!

Multiple Choice

A 3-year-old unvaccinated child presents with high fever, severe sore throat, drooling, and respiratory distress. The culture shows smooth translucent colonies on chocolate agar, no growth on blood agar, growth around Staphylococcus aureus on blood agar, slight oxidase activity, bubbling catalase, and red fluorescence for ALA-porphyrins is absent. Which organism is most likely?

The main idea here is recognizing Haemophilus influenzae by its specific growth requirements and lab traits. This organism is a fastidious Gram-negative coccobacillus that needs both X (hemin) and V (NAD+) factors to grow. Providing those factors comes from lysed red blood cells, which chocolate agar supplies. That’s why you see smooth, translucent colonies on chocolate agar but not on ordinary blood agar—the blood agar lacks readily available X and V factors unless the environment has a source of them. The satellitism around Staphylococcus aureus on blood agar is a classic clue: the nearby Staph releases NAD+, which the Haemophilus around it can scavenge to grow. The organism being oxidase positive (even if only slightly) and catalase positive fits the profile of Haemophilus as a small, oxidase-positive rod/coccobacillus. The absence of red fluorescence for ALA-porphyrins (porphyrin test negative) helps differentiate this organism from others and aligns with Haemophilus influenzae’s typical lab behavior under these conditions. Clinically, Hib epiglottitis is a well-known presentation in unvaccinated children, which matches the scenario of high fever, severe sore throat, drooling, and respiratory distress. So, the features together point to Haemophilus influenzae as the most likely organism. The other organisms wouldn’t fit this exact pattern: they don’t require both X and V factors and typically don’t show the same satellitism on blood agar, nor do they match the porphyrin test result described.

The main idea here is recognizing Haemophilus influenzae by its specific growth requirements and lab traits. This organism is a fastidious Gram-negative coccobacillus that needs both X (hemin) and V (NAD+) factors to grow. Providing those factors comes from lysed red blood cells, which chocolate agar supplies. That’s why you see smooth, translucent colonies on chocolate agar but not on ordinary blood agar—the blood agar lacks readily available X and V factors unless the environment has a source of them.

The satellitism around Staphylococcus aureus on blood agar is a classic clue: the nearby Staph releases NAD+, which the Haemophilus around it can scavenge to grow. The organism being oxidase positive (even if only slightly) and catalase positive fits the profile of Haemophilus as a small, oxidase-positive rod/coccobacillus.

The absence of red fluorescence for ALA-porphyrins (porphyrin test negative) helps differentiate this organism from others and aligns with Haemophilus influenzae’s typical lab behavior under these conditions.

Clinically, Hib epiglottitis is a well-known presentation in unvaccinated children, which matches the scenario of high fever, severe sore throat, drooling, and respiratory distress.

So, the features together point to Haemophilus influenzae as the most likely organism. The other organisms wouldn’t fit this exact pattern: they don’t require both X and V factors and typically don’t show the same satellitism on blood agar, nor do they match the porphyrin test result described.

More practice questions